Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
To: comar@adacore.com
Cc: hilfingr@gnat.com, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: : Re: [RFC] multiple breakpoints from FILE:LINE
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17354.31047.417000.385481@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43C9AAA8.2030605@adacore.com>

>>>>> "Cyrille" == Cyrille Comar <comar@adacore.com> writes:

 >>> Those menus have got to go.  They're (a) confusing to users (in
 >>> my opinion, no real data), and (b) extremely awkward for
 >>> graphical frontends....

 Cyrille> I agree with Daniel's (a) & (b). I have never grumbled
 Cyrille> before on this topic because I did not have anything
 Cyrille> constructive to contribute. This thread gave me an
 Cyrille> idea. Here it is:

 Cyrille> I believe it would be worthwhile to have 2 different break
 Cyrille> commands: - break - break-multiple (or whatever other more
 Cyrille> appropriate name)

 Cyrille> break-multiple would have the semantics advocated by Daniel
 Cyrille> (break automatically on all relevant locations)

 Cyrille> break, instead of presenting a menu, would issue an error of
 Cyrille> the kind:

 Cyrille> (gdb) break FILENAME:LINENUM multiple choices for this
 Cyrille> breakpoint, please use any of the following: break-multiple
 Cyrille> FILENAME:LINENUM break FILENAME:instance1.function:LINENUM

Nice.  What syntax would you use for the two constructors, and three
destructors, that have the same C++ names?

	     paul


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-15 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-15  1:51 Cyrille Comar
2006-01-15 16:33 ` Paul Koning [this message]
2006-01-15 16:45   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-15 17:41     ` Robert Dewar
2006-01-15 22:23       ` Paul Koning
2006-01-16 13:43     ` Cyrille Comar
2006-01-16 13:47       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-16 14:16         ` Cyrille Comar
2006-01-16 15:31       ` Paul Koning
2006-01-15 17:38   ` Robert Dewar
2006-01-16  6:58     ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-16 10:03       ` Robert Dewar
2006-01-16 10:04       ` Robert Dewar
2006-01-15 22:23 ` Paul Hilfinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17354.31047.417000.385481@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
    --to=pkoning@equallogic.com \
    --cc=comar@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hilfingr@gnat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox