From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22218 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2005 23:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22206 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2005 23:55:55 -0000 Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:55:55 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p59-tnt1.snap.net.nz [202.124.110.59]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABAA731157; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:55:51 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id A19188402; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:56:30 +1300 (NZDT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17250.47790.110383.508587@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:56:00 -0000 To: Mark Kettenis Cc: drow@false.org, brobecker@adacore.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Moving GDB sources to subversion? In-Reply-To: <200510282324.j9SNOHql024377@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> References: <20051028222253.GX1155@adacore.com> <200510282256.j9SMu2pQ002862@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20051028231430.GA9909@nevyn.them.org> <200510282324.j9SNOHql024377@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 > The we're on the same wavelength. Let's put our effort into improving > GDB; not in changing our infrastructure, let alone discussions about > our infrastructure. Following that argument, GDB would still be distributed by tape. We can assume that GCC developers have made a sound technical decision. We should focus on how GDB development differs from that of GCC and whether that difference impacts on the choice of version control used. Nick