From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26956 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2005 01:21:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26915 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2005 01:21:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2005 01:21:50 -0000 Received: from farnswood.snap.net.nz (p44-tnt1.snap.net.nz [202.124.110.44]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4B8499A91; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:21:49 +1200 (NZST) Received: by farnswood.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3617162A51; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:21:40 +0000 (GMT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16959.33075.606023.632089@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 01:21:00 -0000 To: Stan Shebs Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Product branches in the GDB repository? In-Reply-To: <423F68A3.3090703@apple.com> References: <20050322002034.GA19385@nevyn.them.org> <423F68A3.3090703@apple.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2 > (Does that mean Apple GDB should get a branch here too? > Interesting question...) In that case, do Apple intend to merge their changes with HEAD at some stage? I am particularly interested in their changes to GDB/MI. Nick