Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: internal-error: insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_sal
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16877.33664.336543.446168@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41ED5C15.7070401@gnu.org>

 > > Second time:
 > > 
 > > #0  internal_error (file=0x8221657 "infrun.c", line=2668, 
 > >     string=0x81ef7a1 "%s: Assertion `%s' failed.") at utils.c:789
 > > #1  0x080fbdda in insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_sal (sr_sal=
 > >       {symtab = 0x0, section = 0x0, line = 0, pc = 134872212, end = 0}, sr_id=
 > >       {stack_addr = 3221220224, code_addr = 134872206, special_addr = 0, stack_addr_p = 1, code_addr_p = 1, special_addr_p = 0}) at infrun.c:2672
 > 
 > ... and this sal/id look identical (true?).

Well symtab = 0x0 looks unassigned to me.

 > This suggests that rather than inserting two different step-resume 
 > breakpoints it's inserting the same one twice (for possibly different 
 > reasons).
 > 
 > Is it possible to determine exactly why the step-resume breakpoint is 
 > being inserted for each of these cases?  If we know that the testsuite 
 > becomes possible, and with a testsuite a fix.

You'll probably need to give me a few clues. First time round,
stop_signal = TARGET_SIGNAL_0,
 and second time,
stop_signal = TARGET_SIGNAL_IO.

Does that tell you anything?


Nick


  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-18 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-24  4:02 Nick Roberts
2005-01-16 10:54 ` Nick Roberts
2005-01-18 18:59   ` Andrew Cagney
2005-01-18 21:53     ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2005-01-19 15:55       ` Andrew Cagney
2005-01-20  0:59         ` Nick Roberts
2005-01-20 10:23           ` Dave Korn
2005-01-20 10:58             ` Nick Roberts
2005-01-20 17:07           ` Andrew Cagney
2005-01-21  2:47             ` Nick Roberts
2005-01-24 21:59               ` Andrew Cagney
2005-01-26 10:19                 ` Nick Roberts
2005-01-26 16:26                   ` Andrew Cagney
2005-01-26 20:48                     ` Nick Roberts
2005-01-26 21:39                       ` Andrew Cagney
2005-01-27  1:02                         ` Nick Roberts
2005-02-06  7:16                           ` Andrew Cagney
2005-02-06  7:26                             ` Andrew Cagney
2005-02-06 20:11                             ` Nick Roberts
2005-02-08 16:57                               ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16877.33664.336543.446168@farnswood.snap.net.nz \
    --to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
    --cc=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox