From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15001 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2004 00:06:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14991 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2004 00:06:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sadr.equallogic.com) (66.155.203.134) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2004 00:06:06 -0000 Received: from sadr.equallogic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sadr.equallogic.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8F065Fp029873 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:06:05 -0400 Received: from deneb.dev.equallogic.com (deneb [172.16.1.99]) by sadr.equallogic.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8F065sw029868; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:06:05 -0400 Received: from pkoning.equallogic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by deneb.dev.equallogic.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i8F064n18169; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:06:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16711.34668.469973.591378@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 00:06:00 -0000 From: Paul Koning To: cagney@gnu.org Cc: jimb@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: breakpoints in C++ constructors References: <41474318.2090405@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00113.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney writes: >> In the following thread, Daniel Jacobowitz and Michael Chastain >> talked about the user interface implications of constructing >> distinct names for the two instances of the constructor: >> >> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2004-07/msg00161.html Andrew> It's important that we view these as separate problems: Andrew> - a mechanism for explicitly specifying either of the Andrew> in-charge or not-in-charge constructor Andrew> - a mechanism for specifying the "constructor" (meaning all) Andrew> I think users want both, and would be over the moon, if they Andrew> just got the first (that's the polite translation). I'm not sure what that means. But in any case, I'd like to have #1 for a start, because right now I have nothing. (Well, unless I do what I did before, which is to turn on the "verbose" flag in the demangler as a hack, so the two constructors and the three destructors have different names.) paul