From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10529 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2004 20:03:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10521 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 20:03:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 20:03:27 -0000 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id DC8891A440D; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:02:20 -0500 (EST) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16381.46924.812129.531294@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:03:00 -0000 To: David Carlton Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com, Jim Blandy , Elena Zannoni Subject: Re: GDB 6.1 branch end jan? In-Reply-To: References: <3FFC98E8.8010001@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 David Carlton writes: > On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 18:40:24 -0500, Andrew Cagney said: > > > According to the release schedule: > > > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/schedule/ > > > GDB 6.1 is ment to branch sometime in January. Now that the SPARC > > rewrite has been merged (and SPARC is looking really healthy, go > > mark!) its time to come up with a more concrete set of dates. Let's > > try: > > > ~branch 2004-01-31 > > ~release 2004-03-15 > > We're at an unfortunate state in my C++ work right now - I'm still > waiting for symtab approval for > , and > frankly there are more patches that would ideally go in after that. > I'm not saying that the above dates are impossible, but it would be > nice if that patch got looked at soon... > I did start reviewing that patch at the time, but got distracted for a few weeks and totally forgot about it. I am looking at it right now. How many more patches after that are left? elena