From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6784 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2003 15:26:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6777 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2003 15:26:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sadr.equallogic.com) (66.155.203.134) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Dec 2003 15:26:35 -0000 Received: from sadr.equallogic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sadr.equallogic.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBVFQZf9018439 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:26:35 -0500 Received: from deneb.dev.equallogic.com (deneb [172.16.1.99]) by sadr.equallogic.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBVFQZiu018434; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:26:35 -0500 Received: from PKONING.equallogic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by deneb.dev.equallogic.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBVFQYF09871; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:26:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16370.60074.841000.648191@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:26:00 -0000 From: Paul Koning To: drow@mvista.com Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Looking for a gdb function to handle alias addresses References: <16369.64013.161868.574183@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20031230230043.GA17557@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00294.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:19:57PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: >> If this doesn't currently exist, could anyone offer hints as to >> where such a beast could be added (and what form, roughly, it >> should take)? Daniel> I can't imagine how you would do this. You'd need everywhere Daniel> that does symbol lookups to apply your theoretical method, at Daniel> the very least. So I take it the function I need doesn't exist at the moment. Should I interpret your comment as "don't even think about doing this, it's too ugly" or "sure you can do this but you'll have to insert the hook in a lot of places" ? If the latter, is another gdbarch function hook the right way? paul