From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1721 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2003 22:34:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1713 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2003 22:34:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sadr.equallogic.com) (66.155.203.134) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2003 22:34:30 -0000 Received: from sadr.equallogic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sadr.equallogic.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAQMYRfB001954 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:34:27 -0500 Received: from deneb.dev.equallogic.com (deneb [172.16.1.99]) by sadr.equallogic.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAQMYQiu001949; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:34:26 -0500 Received: from localhost.equallogic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by deneb.dev.equallogic.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAQMYP904917; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:34:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16325.10865.878988.114821@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 22:34:00 -0000 From: Paul Koning To: drow@mvista.com Cc: sawitt@electra.rsc.raytheon.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB can't read core References: <16325.10163.916133.242883@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20031126222925.GB5007@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00275.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:22:43PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: >> Last I looked at this (in 5.3) there was a general presumption in >> gdb that it would never support core dump reading in any >> cross-gdb. >> >> I beat on it for a while to get rid of that assumption; it was not >> totally trivial but not all that hard, either. But it was a bit >> of a hack job, so I'm not prepared to submit the resulting changes >> as gdb patches. >> >> Is this considered the Right Way for it to behave? Or is this a >> deficiency that's awaiting fixing in some grand overhaul? Daniel> It's been fixed for almost every GNU/Linux target already, as Daniel> people find time. Ah... In my case, the problem appeared with NetBSD/MIPS. paul