Re: GDB interface with simulator

[Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com>]

Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
 > > I don't recall why support for gdbserver+sim has been removed.
 > > Maybe I'm mistaken and it's still there and I just can't see it.
 > 
 > Because there was no point.  The current simulators link directly into
 > GDB, and the simulator interface has changed since anyone tried to use
 > gdbserver that way.  The correct thing is to write a layer in your
 > simulator that serves the same purpose (speaks the remote protocol). 
 > It's not too hard.

How about instead of adding it to every simulator,
just add it as a common piece of code that gets linked in with
<target>-run and turned on when some argument is passed.

OTOH, is all one would end up doing is copying a bunch of code
from gdb/gdbserver to sim/common?

[That's an honest question.  Just trying to learn how you require it.]