From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2041 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2003 20:00:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2029 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2003 20:00:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Jul 2003 20:00:51 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6SK0pZ29238 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:00:51 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6SK0oI08210; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:00:50 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6SK0nv20823; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:00:49 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id BB9D52CB2D; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:08:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16165.33456.576337.632170@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 20:00:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Roland McGrath , gdb@sources.redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: FYI: Increase in schedlock.exp failures in LinuxThreads on an RH kernel In-Reply-To: <20030728194948.GA25297@nevyn.them.org> References: <20030727161737.GA23676@nevyn.them.org> <200307281948.h6SJmHG01050@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20030728194948.GA25297@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00322.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 12:48:17PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > I noticed recently, after switching kernels (I'm temporarily running a > > > Debian system with a Red Hat kernel - don't ask) > > > > We won't ask. But, as you might imagine, we do run the gdb test suite on > > our kernels, and we haven't seen this. So you indeed must have hit upon a > > lucky combination of hardware and software between that RH kernel and your > > Debian userland that happens to bite. > > Have you run a testsuite using LinuxThreads, but the NPTL-aware kernel? > That should be enough to trigger it, I think. It won't show up in > NPTL, because the SIGINT will be load balanced and only delivered to > one of the threads. > No, not usually. I can try though. elena > > > Ingo/Roland - might want to export ShdPnd in the RH kernels... > > > > We probably will. I always used that patch when debugging the kernel > > signals code in the past. > > Thanks. > > -- > Daniel Jacobowitz > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer