From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3922 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2003 16:36:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3915 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2003 16:36:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jul 2003 16:36:25 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6IGaPH17045 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:36:25 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6IGaPI00453 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:36:25 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6IGaO514962; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:36:24 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id B0D802CA3E; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:43:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16152.9144.489108.53763@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 16:36:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Tom Tromey , David Carlton , gdb Subject: Re: GDB and Java In-Reply-To: <20030718161212.GB18488@nevyn.them.org> References: <87smp3esha.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20030718161212.GB18488@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:59:13AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > > >>>>> "David" == David Carlton writes: > > > > David> Tom, I just committed a large GDB patch that, among other things, > > David> touches the dynamic class symbol part of jv-lang.c. Can you give > > David> current mainline a whirl to make sure that I didn't screw anything up? > > > > I said I'd do this a while back, and I wanted to let you know I didn't > > forget -- but also that I can't easily do it. I'm using RHL 9, and my > > understanding is that the NPTL patches aren't in main line gdb yet. > > At least, when I tried debugging with the cvs gdb a couple weeks back, > > I had no end of troubles. So, sorry about that. > > It should, mostly, work now. I'm not sure what the remaining issues > are, but the NPTL patches were added. > Yes it works fine. I am using it now on RHL. elena > -- > Daniel Jacobowitz > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer