From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28460 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2003 15:46:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28431 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2003 15:46:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2003 15:46:54 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6HFkrH29582 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:46:54 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6HFkrI31293 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:46:53 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (IDENT:QW72FXF+2BpZD/EmPJI19mAv1Oi5O3Vo@tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6HFkq510248; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:46:52 -0400 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id CDEF32CA3E; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:54:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16150.50845.621494.745376@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:46:00 -0000 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: my 6.0 todo list In-Reply-To: <200307171435.h6HEZ7sb013840@duracef.shout.net> References: <200307171435.h6HEZ7sb013840@duracef.shout.net> X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00203.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > On my list: > > gdb backtrace bugs > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1250 > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1253 > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1255 > > dejagnu build issue > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/708 > > red hat linux 9 > elena z how is it going? > I didn't have a chance to continue on this, sorry. It occured to me that there is a potential train about to hit us, which is the tree-ssa gcc work. Apparently it is going to produce really really heavily optimized code, and I am worried abuot how well gdb will cope for this. I'd like to add this to the list of gcc's we test. I hope I'll get a chance to do this soon. There is a public branch that is called tree-ssa-20020619-branch. elena > Off the top of my head, my test bed isn't producing any regressions > besides the backtrace bugs. But I won't swear that it is clean until > I get out the microscope though. > > >From my last "5.3 versus HEAD" report, > > MI issues > how is MI these days? > > x86-64 regressions > how is it these days? > > multi-register variables > fixed! > > java regression > fixed! > > gcc HEAD -gstabs+ > The nastiest pr, gcc/10055, got fixed in gcc. > > There are other regressions with gcc HEAD with both dwarf-2 and > stabs+ but this does not stop a gdb release. > > I will put out a "5.3 versus gdb_6_0-branch" report next week. > I've been hoping for some of the backtrace bugs to get fixed first. > > Michael C