From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-14609-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 30588 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2003 00:14:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30581 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2003 00:14:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Jul 2003 00:14:02 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h610E2H04378
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 20:14:02 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h610E2I30922
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 20:14:02 -0400
Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h610DvE14130;
	Mon, 30 Jun 2003 20:13:57 -0400
Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469)
	id 11FAE2CAB2; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 20:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16128.54238.846514.981630@localhost.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 00:14:00 -0000
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: IBM S/390 prologue analysis revisited
In-Reply-To: <1030630233621.ZM27669@localhost.localdomain>
References: <vt2d6gv2lt3.fsf@zenia.home>
	<1030630233621.ZM27669@localhost.localdomain>
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2

Kevin Buettner writes:
 > On Jun 30,  6:22pm, Jim Blandy wrote:
 > 
 > > So, how do you folks feel the balance falls?
 > 
 > I'd like to see your patch go in, if for no other reason than that
 > it'll help provide better backtraces for executables which lack
 > debugging information.  (DWARF CFI won't always be available,
 > will it?)
 > 

yeah, I agree.

 > Also, I happen to think that the implementation is pretty cool and I
 > think it'd be worth having around as a good example of how to
 > implement a prologue analyzer.
 > 

yes, please

elena


 > Kevin