From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11890 invoked by alias); 1 May 2003 23:00:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11845 invoked from network); 1 May 2003 23:00:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neon-gw.transmeta.com) (63.209.4.196) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 May 2003 23:00:00 -0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by neon-gw.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA04075; Thu, 1 May 2003 15:59:55 -0700 Received: from mailhost.transmeta.com(10.1.1.15) by neon-gw.transmeta.com via smap (V2.1) id xma004064; Thu, 1 May 03 15:59:29 -0700 Received: from casey.transmeta.com (casey.transmeta.com [10.10.25.22]) by deepthought.transmeta.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h41MxXa15192; Thu, 1 May 2003 15:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dje@localhost) by casey.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id PAA09390; Thu, 1 May 2003 15:59:33 -0700 From: Doug Evans MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16049.42709.504163.790563@casey.transmeta.com> Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 23:00:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Inferior function call command set In-Reply-To: <3EB1A43B.1040704@redhat.com> References: <3EB16A02.9080904@redhat.com> <16049.36280.775609.622335@casey.transmeta.com> <3EB1916D.7020102@redhat.com> <16049.38488.94378.161876@casey.transmeta.com> <3EB1A43B.1040704@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > GDB tries to insert a breakpoint at that address Ah, yes. Forgot about that part. Thanks. [In my target having a (pseudo-)arbitrary call-dummy-address isn't a problem, so I kinda glossed over that part in my mind. Oh well.]