From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29856 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2003 20:44:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29849 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2003 20:44:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nick.uklinux.net) (194.247.50.162) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2003 20:44:11 -0000 Received: by nick.uklinux.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id E3F8776037; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 20:40:13 +0000 (GMT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15971.48556.869220.215035@nick.uklinux.net> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 20:44:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: bob_rossi@cox.net, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB/MI revisited In-Reply-To: <3E63A84A.4030407@redhat.com> References: <15940.5214.123419.414411@nick.uklinux.net> <3E5CEA03.2070007@redhat.com> <15967.54551.724257.774642@nick.uklinux.net> <3E616E6D.1080908@redhat.com> <15970.39290.513649.825076@nick.uklinux.net> <3E63A84A.4030407@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 > What about defining `level three' annotations as the event stuff from > level two but with all the breakpoint et.al. markups removed? I think this is a good idea if it doesn't mean too much extra work for you. It would certainly create some breathing space. Perhaps you could be more specific about al if you are planning to remove other annotations than breakpoints-invalid e.g frames-invalid. > Having the CLI generate event annotations is hardly different to having > MI generate it's event messages. Which annotations constitute the event annotations? Nick