From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20987 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2003 21:22:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20978 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2003 21:22:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nick.uklinux.net) (194.247.50.220) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 4 Feb 2003 21:22:41 -0000 Received: by nick.uklinux.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8388176037; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:19:37 +0000 (GMT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15936.11881.213367.277430@nick.uklinux.net> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 21:22:00 -0000 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Cc: Elena Zannoni , Bob Rossi , Jim Blandy , Peter Kovacs Subject: Re: obsoleting annotate level 2 In-Reply-To: References: <20030204124435.GB2565@white> <15935.57871.225622.319870@localhost.redhat.com> <20030204161241.GA2354@kovax.org> <15935.60311.219378.382239@localhost.redhat.com> <20030204163737.GB3194@white> <15935.62741.750089.282679@localhost.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 > Thus, while level one annotations are only a small maintenance burden, > level two annotations are. Even if Emacs had been using level two > annotations for years, we would be trying to get rid of them. A possible further reason for keeping level one annotations is that, like GDB/MI, it is really a machine interface (that is the output is intended to be read by a program). How about renaming it GDB/MI level 0 ;-) Nick