From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1434 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2002 15:08:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1390 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2002 15:08:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 2002 15:08:26 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA4Ek2w09559 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:46:02 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA4F8Qf06176 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:08:26 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (IDENT:OFsTJdXenAGcgko4pN+56sXZl42PShvn@tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA4F8PT18358; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:08:25 -0500 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id B7DFEFF79; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:04:18 -0500 (EST) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15814.35954.616449.600387@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 07:08:00 -0000 To: David Carlton Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , Elena Zannoni , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Status of c++ branches? In-Reply-To: References: <15813.48666.101367.943712@localhost.redhat.com> <20021104012001.GA7441@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 David Carlton writes: > On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 20:20:01 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz said: > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 07:23:54PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > >> David, I am just curious, what is the status of your branch? Did you > >> abandon development on it? Is DanielJ's the active one? When I am > >> going to start looking at that, I don't want to look at the wrong > >> branch. > > > David's is still active, and then he's merging pieces onto mine from > > time to time > > Right. There's stuff on mine that I think is probably a good idea > eventually but that isn't giving any concrete benefits right now. For > example, I've moved the symbol storage parts of blocks into a separate > structure on my branch, and I spent the last week rewriting > decode_line_1 on my branch. Both of these might be good ideas > eventually, but they're not directly improving GDB's C++ behavior yet, > so I haven't merged them to Daniel's branch yet. > > Having said that, even the stuff I've merged into Daniel's branch > isn't ready for the mainline yet: some of the data structures will > definitely change. I move something over to his branch if it handles > a case that GDB can't handle currently, and does it in a reasonably > coherent fashion, but C++'s rules are complicated enough that it'll > take a while for the data structures to settle down. > Ok, thanks for explaining. Elena > David Carlton > carlton@math.stanford.edu