From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-10694-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2284 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2002 00:12:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2271 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 00:12:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 00:12:16 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g91NrVi04716
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 19:53:31 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g920CGf23245;
	Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:12:16 -0400
Received: from localhost.redhat.com (IDENT:root@tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g920CEK01869;
	Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:12:15 -0400
Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469)
	id AD19FFF79; Tue,  1 Oct 2002 20:09:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15770.14671.111565.71550@localhost.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 17:12:00 -0000
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: 5.3 vs trunc MI test changes
In-Reply-To: <3D9A2B35.5020102@redhat.com>
References: <3D9A2B35.5020102@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2

Andrew Cagney writes:
 > Hello,
 > 
 > Can someone please look over the attached.  They are the differences 
 > between 5.3 and the head.
 > 
 > The question is, is there anything in this that indicates an MI 
 > interface change, rather than cleanups.  I think it might be ok, I'd 
 > like someone to double check.
 > 
 > Andrew

I think I tracked all the changes down to these testsuite patches.
apparently no mi core changes.

Elena


See:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-09/msg00278.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-09/msg00273.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-09/msg00166.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-09/msg00353.html