From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26758 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2002 18:38:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26751 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 18:38:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 18:38:56 -0000 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id AF176FE71; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:35:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15764.42249.38594.693286@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:38:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Andrew Cagney , Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy'' In-Reply-To: <20020927182200.GA16046@nevyn.them.org> References: <3D938E6F.6090809@redhat.com> <2427-Fri27Sep2002201112+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3D94A16E.6010409@redhat.com> <20020927182200.GA16046@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00485.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:20:30PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >>Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:47:11 -0400 > > >>From: Andrew Cagney > > >> > > >>I'd like to float the idea of moving all the generic dummy frame code > > >>into a new file dummy.[hc]. > > > > > > > > >Yes, but I'd suggest to call the files something other than dummy.*, > > >lest someone thinks they are junk ;-) > > > > But then I can't have a function called ``dummy_spit()'' (OZ? expression > > for blowing one's fuse). > > > > More seriously, I'm struggling for a better name: ``generic'' ``gdf'' > > ``dummy-frame'', ... I guess the last one? > > I think dummy-frame works well. > infcall.[ch] ? (which goes with infcmd.c) Elena > -- > Daniel Jacobowitz > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer