From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24474 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2002 21:08:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24467 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2002 21:08:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Sep 2002 21:08:47 -0000 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 74388FE71; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:05:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15763.30377.326489.312610@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 14:08:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB PR categories In-Reply-To: <3D934F11.6050809@redhat.com> References: <3D934F11.6050809@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00458.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > Following up from what Elena did. What do people think of the following > PR categories. Ok. seems reasonable. Even though there may be some overlap of categories. Watch out for characters like '-' '+' '/' in the names. Maybe double check with Fernando. Elena > > a29k > alpha > arc > arm > avr > cris > d10v > d30v > fr30 > h8300 > h8500 > i386 > i960 > ia64 > m32r > m68hc11 > m68k > m88k > mcore > mn10200 > mn10300 > ns32k > pa > powerpc > s390 > sh > sparc > tic80 > v850 > vax > w65 > x86-64 > xstormy16 > z8k > > aix > djgpp > GNU/Linux > FreeBSD > NetBSD > OpenBSD > hurd > solaris > other os > > c++ > java > pascal > scheme > ada > objc > > threads > sharedlibs > remote > server > cli > mi > tui > symtab > > It kind of reflects the maintainers file. We can, like everything else, > always do this incrementally :-) > > Thoughts? > Andrew > >