From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15710 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2002 00:56:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15702 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2002 00:56:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potter.sfbay.redhat.com) (205.180.83.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jul 2002 00:56:07 -0000 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (IDENT:9Z/y6Rmmt+n6KjWH3OQJnQaid3TUYtLM@romulus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.251]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6F0ucQ13535; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:56:46 -0700 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 135D4107DB; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 20:54:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15666.7508.511151.45057@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:56:00 -0000 To: Christopher Faylor Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: readline 4.2 update In-Reply-To: <20020705174616.GJ30783@redhat.com> References: <20020627181845.A4376@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020705104907.A82443@oolong.il.thewrittenword.com> <20020705090235.A89810@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020705174616.GJ30783@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00149.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor writes: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 09:02:35AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 10:49:07AM -0500, Albert Chin wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 06:18:45PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > >> > Would it be possible for src/readline to be updated to 4.2 before the > >> > next major GDB release? At the moment it is impossible to build stock > >> > sources with the latest stock libreadline (which is installed as a > >> > separate lib in FreeBSD) due to conflicting definitions of `tilde_expand' > >> > in gdb/defs.h. > >> > >> Latest readline version is 4.2a. > > > >Works for me too. :-) > >But I haven't heard any opinion about updating readline. > > I'm sure it's just a matter of tuit cycles for the person responsible for > importing readline. > > cgf Yes, that would be me. I'll bump up the priority of the task. Elena