From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>, Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>,
gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: discuss: How to print XMM registers on i386/x86-64
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 10:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15532.37867.707838.943203@localhost.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CAC8B94.7020904@cygnus.com>
Andrew Cagney writes:
> > Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz> writes:
> >
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >> current gdb has a problem with printing xmm registers on i386/x86-64
> >> architectures. XMM regsters are of type builtin_type_v4sf. In 5.1.1
> >> the output of 'comand info registers xmm0' was as follows:
> >>
> >> xmm0 0x00102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f0
> >> Now in current mainline it's completely broken (with the same type):
> >>
> >> xmm0 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} \
> >> {f = {5.82303983e-10, 2.77686634e+29, -1.16826016e-09, \
> >> -5.56616044e+29}}
>
> When you say broken, you mean the output or the values?
>
> >> If I change the type to builtin_type_v4si I get a more useful output:
> >>
> >> xmm0 {f = {0x30201000, 0x70605040, 0xb0a09080, 0xf0e0d0c0}} \
> >> {f = {807407616, 1885360192, -1331654528, -253701952}}
> >>
> >> So my question is how to print it? We shouldn't treat XMM registers as
> >> 4xFP, because it can contain 1) two double precision floats, 2) four
> >> single precision floats, 3) from 16 bytes, 8 words, 4 double words, 2
> >> quadwords or 1 double quadword (128b).
>
>
> The idea behind the registers having struct/union types was to make it
> possible for the user to ``explore'' (and access) sub fields and the
> composite vis:
>
> $xmm0.v4si[1]
> $xmm0.v2di[0]
>
> (don't quote me on the syntax). It sounds like the current type isn't
> sufficient - a union of types is needed?
>
> Can I suggest treating how ``info registers'' displays registers as a
> separate problem - the code is free to display the registers in what
> ever format it sees fit.
>
> >> For now gcc won't store more than one FP variable into each register,
> >> ie. we don't need to convert all parts to float.
>
> I think the full register contents should be displayed - we can't assume
> that the user is using GCC.
>
> Ok, one MMX patch comming right up ...
>
> Andrew
>
>
Another example to look at is the printing of the AltiVec registers.
The code for this is in rs6000-tdep.c.
Elena
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-04 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-04 7:16 Michal Ludvig
2002-04-04 7:25 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-04-04 9:21 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-04 10:03 ` Elena Zannoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15532.37867.707838.943203@localhost.redhat.com \
--to=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=aj@suse.de \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mludvig@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox