From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25871 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2007 18:09:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 25187 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2007 18:08:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (212.77.101.5) by sourceware.org with QMTP; 26 Mar 2007 18:08:50 -0000 Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 16746 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2007 20:08:49 +0200 Received: from host86-128-14-58.range86-128.btcentralplus.com (HELO BIGOS) (jagorak@[86.128.14.58]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP for ; 26 Mar 2007 20:08:49 +0200 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:09:00 -0000 From: jagorak X-Mailer: Private Mailer 1.0 Reply-To: jagorak Message-ID: <1522629125.20070326190847@wp.pl> To: Joel Brobecker CC: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sourceware.org, hilfinger@adacore.com Subject: Re[2]: Ada arrays - a problem with aggregate notation. In-Reply-To: <20070326021736.GX6663@adacore.com> References: <19311509093.20070325002416@wp.pl> <20070325020544.GS6663@adacore.com> <20070326021736.GX6663@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A. X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00314.txt.bz2 JB> Actually, I take that back, I tried on a simple example, and the JB> assignment went smoothly. I'm pretty busy these days, but if Jan JB> could send more details, I'll do my best to look at this (sources, JB> build command, platform, GDB version, and a copy/paste of the GDB JB> session). Ah... a hundred apologies! - my mistake. Yes - the assignments using aggregates work fine. After your post Joel I realized that I was using version 6.3 of the GDB (which I was not aware of at the time, even though I quoted exact version of the manual in my original post...). I've just tried with version 6.5 and everything works fine and I'm sure it will be the case with 6.6. Many thanks, Jan