Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Machado via Gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
To: Phil Phil <heidegg@hotmail.com>,
	"gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Stack segments for Aarch64
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 11:29:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151075d3-8d7a-4bae-a18b-648ba736a9a0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DS0PR22MB40512CCE3F3A9F240276C43FAAFA2@DS0PR22MB4051.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>

Right, "maint info sections" would complement "info proc mapping", if you want to have the visibility of all
the interacting pieces in exec, core file and memory.

On 6/6/24 11:27, Phil Phil wrote:
> Would you suggest that the output of maintenance info sections is more "complete" if you want to see all mapped memory regions?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 6, 2024 10:15 AM
> *To:* Phil Phil <heidegg@hotmail.com>; gdb@sourceware.org <gdb@sourceware.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Stack segments for Aarch64
>  
> On 6/6/24 10:57, Phil Phil wrote:
>> Should the stack segment still be there though? I compared a stackpointer to the memory areas from info proc mappings and I can't find a match. 
> 
> You'll likely find it in a core file section instead: maint info sections.
> 
> For me:
> 
>  [28]     0xfffffffdf000->0x1000000000000 at 0x00191350: load13 ALLOC LOAD HAS_CONTENTS
> 
> Does that help? GDB will look things up in the core file instead of memory, which is probably
> why the way it displays things is slightly different.
> 
> It could be improved I suppose.
> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 6, 2024 9:41 AM
>> *To:* Phil Phil <heidegg@hotmail.com>; gdb@sourceware.org <gdb@sourceware.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: Stack segments for Aarch64
>>  
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On 6/6/24 10:33, Phil Phil wrote:
>>> GDB 12.1 coredump post mortem coredump debugging on an x64 Linux desktop.  I do not see a perms column in info proc mappings.
>>> 
>> 
>> Ah, so it is corefile debugging. Checking on my end, I don't see the permissions column either. Now it escapes me if we have any
>> special reason for that or if it is just an oversight somewhere. As for the stack marker, I suppose we lose that reference
>> when the corefile is generated. That reference comes from /proc/<pid>/maps when we do "info proc mapping".
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 6, 2024 9:23 AM
>>> *To:* Phil Phil <heidegg@hotmail.com>; gdb@sourceware.org <gdb@sourceware.org>
>>> *Subject:* Re: Stack segments for Aarch64
>>>  
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> On 6/6/24 10:17, Phil Phil via Gdb wrote:
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> 
>>>> I'm trying get some memory info on an Aarch64 for a coredump. The aarch64 gdb produces this output for info proc mappings
>>>> 
>>>>           Start Addr           End Addr       Size     Offset objfile
>>>>         0x557ead9000       0x5582dee000  0x4315000        0x0 /usr/bin/myproc
>>>>         0x5582dfe000       0x5582f0a000   0x10c000  0x4315000 /usr/bin/myproc
>>>>         0x5582f0a000       0x5582f24000    0x1a000  0x4421000 /usr/bin/myproc
>>>> 
>>>> I'm missing at least two things here compared to the x64 output:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>   *
>>>> No read/write permissions
>>>>   *
>>>> Stack segments are not shown.
>>>> 
>>>> Any ideas on how to make these two things visible on Aarch64?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> What aarch64 debugging setup do you have? Versions etc? Remote?
>>> 
>>> For me, running native gdb on aarch64:
>>> 
>>> process 1681741
>>> Mapped address spaces:
>>> 
>>>           Start Addr           End Addr       Size     Offset  Perms  objfile
>>>       0xaaaaaaaa0000     0xaaaaac3c6000  0x1926000        0x0  r-xp   /home/ubuntu/work/build/binutils-gdb-master/gdb/gdb
>>>       0xaaaaac3d5000     0xaaaaacd2a000   0x955000  0x1925000  r--p   /home/ubuntu/work/build/binutils-gdb-master/gdb/gdb
>>>       0xaaaaacfc6000     0xaaaaad069000    0xa3000        0x0  rw-p   [heap]
>>> ...
>>>       0xfffffffdf000    0x1000000000000    0x21000        0x0  rw-p   [stack]
>> 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2024-06-06 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-06  9:17 Phil Phil via Gdb
2024-06-06  9:23 ` Luis Machado via Gdb
2024-06-06  9:33   ` Phil Phil via Gdb
2024-06-06  9:41     ` Luis Machado via Gdb
2024-06-06  9:57       ` Phil Phil via Gdb
2024-06-06 10:15         ` Luis Machado via Gdb
2024-06-06 10:27           ` Phil Phil via Gdb
2024-06-06 10:29             ` Luis Machado via Gdb [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151075d3-8d7a-4bae-a18b-648ba736a9a0@arm.com \
    --to=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=heidegg@hotmail.com \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox