From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19729 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2017 06:42:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19705 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jul 2017 06:42:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=didier, Didier, TRANSCRIPT, Jessie X-HELO: relay.fit.cvut.cz Received: from relay.fit.cvut.cz (HELO relay.fit.cvut.cz) (147.32.232.237) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 06:42:21 +0000 Received: from imap.fit.cvut.cz (imap.fit.cvut.cz [IPv6:2001:718:2:2901:0:0:0:238] (may be forged)) by relay.fit.cvut.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v656gDPJ002261 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 08:42:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz) Received: from sao (ip-62-24-85-77.net.upcbroadband.cz [62.24.85.77]) (authenticated bits=0 as user vranyj1) by imap.fit.cvut.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v656gCiW013277 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 08:42:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz) Message-ID: <1499236932.24598.1.camel@fit.cvut.cz> Subject: MI / Python tests failing on my machine (x86_64) From: Jan Vrany To: "gdb@sourceware.org" Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 06:42:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-FIT-MailScanner-ID: v656gDPJ002261 X-FIT-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-FIT-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=1.01, required 7, MISSING_FROM 1.00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD 0.01) X-FIT-MailScanner-SpamScore: s X-FIT-MailScanner-From: jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz X-FIT-MailScanner-Watermark: 1499841735.72341@IlgBYX3GqX6U5I+4NG/Fiw X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 Hi there, I'm experimenting with Didier Nadeau's patches for python-defined MI commands [1] I tried to compile recent gdb (25c5412713ba) and then run MI and python tests to ensure all is OK before I start hacking. I run these tests using: make check RUNTESTFLAGS='TRANSCRIPT=y gdb.mi/*.exp gdb.python/*.exp'  but 58 tests seems to fail: # of expected passes 4810 # of unexpected failures 58 # of expected failures 9 # of known failures 13 # of untested testcases 3 # of unsupported tests 1 For GDB 8.0.0 (1f1c02597cc1) test results are the same on my machine. I compiled gdb on Linux (Debian Jessie if that matters) using simple ./configure && make Is that expected? Do I need to perform some additional setup to run tests? Thanks, Jan [1]: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2017-06/msg00010.html