From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22470 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2004 09:18:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22444 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2004 09:17:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2004 09:17:57 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-194-35.inter.net.il [80.230.194.35]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id EBY42358; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:17:55 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 09:18:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-Id: <1438-Fri06Aug2004121531+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4112995F.4070009@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:32:31 -0400) Subject: Re: End-of-life [^_]deprecated_registers[^_] in GDB 6.3 Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4112995F.4070009@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:32:31 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > The global variable deprecated_registers was clearly marked as such in > '02. It was in the bad books for a lot longer, but that's the point at > which we can say that the line was clearly drawn :-) As such, it's time > to remove it. > > This has the potential to adversly affect the following files/systems: > > hppah-nat.c > hpux-thread.c > i386gnu-nat.c I'd bring the gnu-nat case to RMS's attention, in case he would like to do something about that. > ia64-aix-nat.c > ia64-linux-nat.c Are we really abandoning ia64-linux-nat?