From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29055 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2013 16:48:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29028 invoked by uid 89); 25 Oct 2013 16:48:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e23smtp04.au.ibm.com Received: from e23smtp04.au.ibm.com (HELO e23smtp04.au.ibm.com) (202.81.31.146) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:48:14 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp04.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:48:10 +1000 Received: from d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (202.81.31.214) by e23smtp04.au.ibm.com (202.81.31.210) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:48:08 +1000 Received: from d23relay04.au.ibm.com (d23relay04.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.120]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFF33578052; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 03:48:08 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r9PGUq5o8978752; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 03:30:52 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r9PGm7KR022948; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 03:48:07 +1100 Received: from [192.168.1.113] (vorma.rchland.ibm.com [9.10.86.174]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id r9PGm5UH022917; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 03:48:06 +1100 Subject: Re: git is live From: Peter Bergner To: Tom Tromey Cc: GDB Development , Binutils Development , Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho In-Reply-To: <871u395oil.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <877gd5iyaz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1382709091.5918.9.camel@otta> <871u395oil.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1382719684.5918.32.camel@otta> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: No X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13102516-9264-0000-0000-000004CD2196 X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 10:00 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > My understanding is that gdb followed "gcc rules" here: any maintainer > could make a branch provided the branch guidelines were followed. > > See > > https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Internals%20Experimental-Branches Great! > I think the reason nobody really made branches is just because CVS made > it hard. Right, that was my understanding as well, I just wanted to be sure there wasn't another reason due to some policy decision I was unaware of. It seems not, and since you and Ian both seem to say it should be ok and I'm guessing Alan won't object, I will assume this is ok. Thanks! Peter