From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-42185-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28834 invoked by alias); 23 May 2013 04:41:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 28823 invoked by uid 89); 23 May 2013 04:41:46 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from oproxy12-pub.bluehost.com (HELO oproxy12-pub.bluehost.com) (50.87.16.10)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with SMTP; Thu, 23 May 2013 04:41:45 +0000
Received: (qmail 5589 invoked by uid 0); 23 May 2013 04:41:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box531.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.131)  by oproxy12.bluehost.com with SMTP; 23 May 2013 04:41:43 -0000
Received: from [146.115.71.23] (port=34425 helo=[172.31.1.206])	by box531.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (SSLv3:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256)	(Exim 4.80)	(envelope-from <psmith@gnu.org>)	id 1UfNLT-00058K-Dy; Wed, 22 May 2013 22:41:43 -0600
Message-ID: <1369284101.7209.197.camel@homebase>
Subject: Re: [GDB 7.6/GCC 4.8.0] Slowdown in GDB macro processing for cores?
From: Paul Smith <psmith@gnu.org>
Reply-To: psmith@gnu.org
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, gdb	 <gdb@sourceware.org>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 04:41:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22ROm94M3deompzcxeNK=JDk+0gQRu_b97c2wua6TT5Rpg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1368733335.4101.743.camel@pdsdesk>	 <51960329.2010802@redhat.com> <1369248335.7209.151.camel@homebase>	 <1369250399.7209.164.camel@homebase> <87wqqqg4e2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	 <1369264444.7209.184.camel@homebase>	 <CADPb22ROm94M3deompzcxeNK=JDk+0gQRu_b97c2wua6TT5Rpg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Identified-User: {678:box531.bluehost.com:madscie1:mad-scientist.us} {sentby:smtp auth 146.115.71.23 authed with paul@mad-scientist.us}
X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2

On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 19:44 -0700, Doug Evans wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Paul Smith <psmith@gnu.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 14:12 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > And the top 10 users in the slow instance:
> >
> > Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
> >   %   cumulative   self               self     total
> >  time   seconds   seconds    calls   ms/call  ms/call  name
> >  23.99     14.26    14.26 69374700      0.00     0.00  lookup_partial_symbol
> >  23.77     28.39    14.13 784950557     0.00     0.00  strcmp_iw
> >  11.74     35.37     6.98 763482775     0.00     0.00  symbol_get_demangled_name
> >   7.23     39.67     4.30 819480663     0.00     0.00  symbol_natural_name
> >   7.22     43.96     4.29   373483      0.01     0.01  lookup_symbol_aux_psymtabs
> >   5.60     47.29     3.33 777569558     0.00     0.00  symbol_matches_domain
> >   4.98     50.25     2.96 819477261     0.00     0.00  symbol_search_name
> >   2.46     51.71     1.46 34366788      0.00     0.00  strcmp_iw_ordered
> >   1.51     52.61     0.90        4    225.00   225.00  fprintf_symbol_filtered
> >   1.46     53.48     0.87 15316453      0.00     0.00  xstrdup
> 
> Looks rather familiar.  :-)

Hi Doug; I'm not sure what that means; is there already a bug filed
about this?  Is it a known issue?

I tested with the latest code on master in the Git repo earlier today
and saw the same slow behavior, so it's not been fixed since 7.6 was
released.

Cheers!