From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21241 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2009 19:50:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 21233 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2009 19:50:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e24smtp02.br.ibm.com (HELO e24smtp02.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.86) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:50:16 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (d24relay01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.16]) by e24smtp02.br.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n22K1ZJU012935 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 17:01:35 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n22KnaEF3239966 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 17:49:36 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n22JoCMC001367 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:50:12 -0300 Received: from [9.18.200.51] ([9.18.200.51]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n22JoBR0001333; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:50:11 -0300 Subject: Re: CVS Head Compile Failure From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Joel Sherrill , "gdb@sourceware.org" In-Reply-To: <20090302193347.GC3632@adacore.com> References: <49AC2AFB.9020509@oarcorp.com> <20090302191812.GB3632@adacore.com> <49AC339D.5070404@oarcorp.com> <20090302193347.GC3632@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:50:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1236023410.8949.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 El lun, 02-03-2009 a las 11:33 -0800, Joel Brobecker escribió: > > Thanks. I have been avoiding "cvs up -Pd" since it pulls > > in the rest of the one build tree but apparently it was > > needed this time. > > > > It builds now. > > Excellent. I avoid the "-d" switch too, for the very same reason. > I don't know if you did a "cvs up -d common" or a plain "cvs up -d", > but you might have pulled more than necessary (in particular in > the testsuite directory, such as testsuite/gdb.tk), and that might > cause you some trouble later. When I need to pull one directory, > I specify exactly which one I want. Just FYI: I don't use cvs update at all. I have a "src -> ." link in the src dir, and from there I do a "cvs -d $(cat CVS/Root) co gdb". Tends to work well, except for this weird half-patch issue I posted a message about. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center