From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30410 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2009 13:48:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 30399 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Feb 2009 13:48:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e24smtp03.br.ibm.com (HELO e24smtp03.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:48:06 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (d24relay01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.16]) by e24smtp03.br.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n12DkYDm016479 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:46:34 -0200 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id n12ElA4A3653768 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:47:10 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n12Dlf6G013737 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:47:42 -0200 Received: from [9.8.5.242] ([9.8.5.242]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n12Dlf3E013725; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:47:41 -0200 Subject: Re: Discussing the next GDB release (GDB 7.0?) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Joel Brobecker Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20090130004258.GB14194@adacore.com> References: <20090115034552.GF24105@adacore.com> <1233114539.16553.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090130004258.GB14194@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:48:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1233582460.7000.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 El jue, 29-01-2009 a las 16:42 -0800, Joel Brobecker escribió: > > To start small, submitting a patch for frame support and convenience > > functions would already allow implementation of $caller_is... What do > > you think? > > I would love to see as much mature python support as possible in > the first release. It's more a matter of how much we can submit > and review before we branch. Go ahead, submit the patches and we > will try to review them. Great. I'll submit them as RFC and we can discuss on the list to decide what is and what isn't mature and merge-worthy. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center