From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28474 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2008 21:56:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 28339 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Aug 2008 21:56:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw1.br.ibm.com (HELO igw1.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:55:49 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw1.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9B132C0C8 for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 18:27:15 -0300 (BRT) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m73LtivQ700628 for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 18:55:44 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m73LtcP9023745 for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 18:55:38 -0300 Received: from [9.18.199.243] ([9.18.199.243]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m73LtbIN023728; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 18:55:37 -0300 Subject: Re: gdb plugin status? From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Neo Jia Cc: gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1217800323.29321.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <5d649bdb0808031010g6330a442xec0415a387d23163@mail.gmail.com> <20080803173108.GA20590@caradoc.them.org> <5d649bdb0808031042i7210287djb225792fc7221319@mail.gmail.com> <1217800323.29321.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:56:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1217800536.29321.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 (Sorry, sent message too early.) On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 18:52 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 10:42 -0700, Neo Jia wrote: > > I am wondering if this is feasible. My plugin will be implemented in C > > as it needs to access the hardware. And I should be able to use it > > from gdb through the Python middle-layer as Python provides the way to > > access .so file. > > > > Am I right? > > Yes, it should work. By the way, if there's any functionality or usecase that you have in mind which is not described or not covered in http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/PythonGdb please let us know. We are very interested in input from potential users of the Python support. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center