Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com>
To: Lokesh Kumar <lokeshk@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Debugging new code using debug-info from old code
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 18:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1210272256.4615.487.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <baf3502a0805071729u6777239cl4e2ed083ab618dd4@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 17:29 -0700, Lokesh Kumar wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I am trying to debug a "transformed" C code using the debugging
> information of the "original" C code. Essentially, my code goes
> through some transformations that keeps its semantic structure same
> but add some extraneous function calls distributed throughout the
> code.
> 
> I want that when a user debugs this new code, all the new additions
> are hidden away from him/her and (s)he feels as if (s)he is debugging
> the original code. What this means is that there should exists an
> underlying mapping between the transformed code and original code so
> that it could map the debugging commands for original code into
> corresponding commands for transformed code.
> 
> I started out by trying to load the symbol table of the original
> executable while debugging the transformed binary but that doesn't
> seem to help since the function addresses and everything else has
> changed. My second thoughts seem to suggest that if I can update the
> debugging information in the transformed binary as per my original
> code, I may get what I want. However, I am not sure how this will work
> if there were some compile-time optimizations in one code and not in
> another but I am not thinking about that now.
> 
> I think I can use some help here. Does anyone here have a better idea
> on how to do it ? Or perhaps, how can I update the debugging
> information from one binary to another ?

This has been done before -- for instance, this is how the 
original "cfront" c++ compiler worked.  "cfront" would pre-process
the C++ source code and generate a transformed C program file, 
which would then be compiled.

In order to make debuggers (notably gdb) display the un-preprocessed
C++ source instead of the processed C source, cfront would generate
"#line" directives in the output (C) program that referred back to
lines within the input (C++) program.

So, if your transformed output file contains some code that 
is associated with, say, line 1000 of your input source file, 
you would instrument the output file with a line directive 
that would look something like 

   #line 1000 'input.c'

Try it.  You can add some line directives by hand and 
compile the code to experiment with the debugger behavior.




      reply	other threads:[~2008-05-08 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-08  0:29 Lokesh Kumar
2008-05-08 18:44 ` Michael Snyder [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1210272256.4615.487.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=msnyder@specifix.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=lokeshk@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox