From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com>
To: Lokesh Kumar <lokeshk@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Debugging new code using debug-info from old code
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 18:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1210272256.4615.487.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <baf3502a0805071729u6777239cl4e2ed083ab618dd4@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 17:29 -0700, Lokesh Kumar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to debug a "transformed" C code using the debugging
> information of the "original" C code. Essentially, my code goes
> through some transformations that keeps its semantic structure same
> but add some extraneous function calls distributed throughout the
> code.
>
> I want that when a user debugs this new code, all the new additions
> are hidden away from him/her and (s)he feels as if (s)he is debugging
> the original code. What this means is that there should exists an
> underlying mapping between the transformed code and original code so
> that it could map the debugging commands for original code into
> corresponding commands for transformed code.
>
> I started out by trying to load the symbol table of the original
> executable while debugging the transformed binary but that doesn't
> seem to help since the function addresses and everything else has
> changed. My second thoughts seem to suggest that if I can update the
> debugging information in the transformed binary as per my original
> code, I may get what I want. However, I am not sure how this will work
> if there were some compile-time optimizations in one code and not in
> another but I am not thinking about that now.
>
> I think I can use some help here. Does anyone here have a better idea
> on how to do it ? Or perhaps, how can I update the debugging
> information from one binary to another ?
This has been done before -- for instance, this is how the
original "cfront" c++ compiler worked. "cfront" would pre-process
the C++ source code and generate a transformed C program file,
which would then be compiled.
In order to make debuggers (notably gdb) display the un-preprocessed
C++ source instead of the processed C source, cfront would generate
"#line" directives in the output (C) program that referred back to
lines within the input (C++) program.
So, if your transformed output file contains some code that
is associated with, say, line 1000 of your input source file,
you would instrument the output file with a line directive
that would look something like
#line 1000 'input.c'
Try it. You can add some line directives by hand and
compile the code to experiment with the debugger behavior.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-08 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-08 0:29 Lokesh Kumar
2008-05-08 18:44 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1210272256.4615.487.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=msnyder@specifix.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=lokeshk@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox