From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2059 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2008 19:02:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 2040 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2008 19:02:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bluesmobile.specifix.com (HELO bluesmobile.specifix.com) (216.129.118.140) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:02:04 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bluesmobile.specifix.com [216.129.118.140]) by bluesmobile.specifix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494CA3C3BA; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: gdb does not remember non-existing names for breakpoints for future dlopen() ? From: Michael Snyder To: Yakov Lerner Cc: gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:05:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1206644522.19253.1249.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-7.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00268.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 16:10 +0200, Yakov Lerner wrote: > When I set breakpoint on a function in the .so that will be loaded later, > I though that gdb remembers the name and sets the breakpoint > automatically later. > > Now in gdb 5.3.90, this is not happening. > Is this a 'old version' thing ? settable option ? Oy gevalt! 5.3? We're just getting ready to release 6.8!