From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23779 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2008 17:32:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 23771 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Mar 2008 17:32:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bluesmobile.specifix.com (HELO bluesmobile.specifix.com) (216.129.118.140) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:32:29 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bluesmobile.specifix.com [216.129.118.140]) by bluesmobile.specifix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259FB3C7AE; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:32:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Async function calls From: Michael Snyder To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Vladimir Prus , gdb@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20080320121019.GA6677@caradoc.them.org> References: <200803201044.47454.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20080320121019.GA6677@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:35:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1206034346.19253.1034.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-7.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 08:10 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:44:46AM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Maybe, somebody have bright ideas? > > Could we pick out the inferior function calls and evaluate them first, > with continuations? Except that could change order of evaluation; > we'd have to read the values of variables at the same time. Sounds like a job for -- ax-gdb!