From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25197 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2008 18:24:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 25181 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2008 18:24:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bluesmobile.specifix.com (HELO bluesmobile.specifix.com) (216.129.118.140) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:23:46 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bluesmobile.specifix.com [216.129.118.140]) by bluesmobile.specifix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87C43BFA6; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:23:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: gdb support for multi-core From: Michael Snyder To: s88 Cc: gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:33:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1204136624.19253.408.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-7.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00232.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 17:23 -0800, s88 wrote: > Hi all: > > How does the multi-core debugging support for gdb? If I have > multi-core architecture (maybe 8 ARM core on QEMU or something), > should I modify the gdb to support this architecture, or just using > individual gdb for each core? I think the multi-core conversation has gone only about as far as "maybe we could treat each core like a thread -- gdb knows about threads..."