From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7390 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2002 17:15:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7290 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2002 17:15:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO thor.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.11) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jan 2002 17:15:28 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (diup-220-109.inter.net.il [213.8.220.109]) by thor.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id AEY26606; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:14:47 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:15:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: mec@shout.net Message-Id: <1190-Tue15Jan2002191130+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com, sassi@uni.de In-reply-to: <200201151357.HAA17255@duracef.shout.net> (message from Michael Elizabeth Chastain on Tue, 15 Jan 2002 07:57:32 -0600) Subject: Re: GDB C++ support Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200201151357.HAA17255@duracef.shout.net> X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 07:57:32 -0600 > From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain > > eli> Do you (or someone else) happen to know whether v5.1 solves some or > eli> all of the specific problems Guido described in his message? If not, > eli> he has no reason to try GDB 5.1, does he? > > Well, gdb 5.0 was released more than a year before gcc 3.0, and gdb 5.1 > was released more than 5 months after gcc 3.0. That's a good reason > to expect that gdb 5.1 will work a lot better than gdb 5.0 when the > target program is compiled with gcc 3.0.3. Yes, the principles are well understood. > I don't have gcc 3.0.3 installed yet (I wish I did). I don't have > djgpp 2.03 installed (I probably never will). And I don't have time > to chase after user bug reports with incomplete source code and gdb 5.0. You don't need to apologize about not having the information I asked for. But there's no need to be harsh, either. Guido wanted to get specific help for his specific problem; if no one has the answer, then the ensuing silence will be self-explanatory ;-) (Btw, there's nothing DJGPP-specific in what Guido asked: DJGPP supports both stabs and DWARF2 debugging, so if someone can answer the questiions for GNU/Linux, say, they will be good for DJGPP as well.) TIA