From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27233 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2003 16:31:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27226 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2003 16:31:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gollum.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2003 16:31:04 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.158.217]) by gollum.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.8-GR) with ESMTP id CAN72467; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 18:30:57 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:31:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) Message-Id: <1190-Sat13Dec2003182933+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20031213152356.AFC9E4B412@berman.michael-chastain.com> (mec.gnu@mindspring.com) Subject: Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20031213152356.AFC9E4B412@berman.michael-chastain.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 10:23:56 -0500 (EST) > From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) > > Supporting untested code costs resources because we can't upgrade the > code to use new interfaces. The fact that a certain platform doesn't get patches does not mean that its code is not used. So I'm not quite sure why you say "untested code" here.