From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3320 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2007 00:18:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 3309 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Mar 2007 00:18:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.palmsource.com (HELO mx2.palmsource.com) (12.7.175.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:18:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.domain.tld (Postfix) with ESMTP id F400C136A8E; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:48:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.palmsource.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.palmsource.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05592-11-78; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:48:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from ussunex01.palmsource.com (unknown [192.168.101.9]) by mx2.palmsource.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6A11375BD; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:14:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from 192.168.92.81 ([192.168.92.81]) by ussunex01.palmsource.com ([192.168.101.9]) via Exchange Front-End Server owa.palmsource.com ([10.0.20.17]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:14:27 +0000 Received: from svmsnyderlnx by owa.palmsource.com; 05 Mar 2007 11:14:26 -0800 Subject: Re: backtrace in core on arm-linux From: Michael Snyder To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20070305185255.GA13217@caradoc.them.org> References: <20070305184323.GA4506@radix50.net> <20070305185255.GA13217@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:18:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1173122066.29183.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 13:52 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 07:43:23PM +0100, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote: > > How can I fix this? > > I don't know. You need to figure out what the difference is - my > first guess would be something wrong with the data your kernel has > saved to the core file (registers or memory). Just as a data point -- a few months ago I tried debugging an arm-linux core file with gdb, and it seemed to work fine then. I believe I was at gdb-6.5. I don't specifically remember doing a backtrace, but it would be surprising if I didn't do one.