From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27571 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2006 22:25:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 27220 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Sep 2006 22:25:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.palmsource.com (HELO mx2.palmsource.com) (12.7.175.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:25:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.domain.tld (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCE2257BF; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.palmsource.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.palmsource.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18019-02-62; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ussunex01.palmsource.com (unknown [192.168.101.9]) by mx2.palmsource.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6187A26E19; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:50:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 192.168.92.59 ([192.168.92.59]) by ussunex01.palmsource.com ([192.168.101.9]) via Exchange Front-End Server owa.palmsource.com ([10.0.20.17]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:50:40 +0000 Received: from svmsnyderlnx by owa.palmsource.com; 28 Sep 2006 14:50:39 -0700 Subject: Re: attach to a socket in localhost:8787 From: Michael Snyder To: op132650c@mail.telepac.pt Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1159475113.njescx5idv4@w2.webmail.telepac.pt> References: <1159431247.1wjx69rdmmgw@webmail.telepac.pt> <20060928125344.GA2415@nevyn.them.org> <1159453247.3m65oqlx4rpc@w6.webmail.telepac.pt> <20060928150107.GA6844@nevyn.them.org> <1159468313.9768.183.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1159475113.njescx5idv4@w2.webmail.telepac.pt> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:25:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1159480239.9768.208.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00184.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 21:25 +0100, op132650c@mail.telepac.pt wrote: > Yes, you right. I didn't know that it was possible GDB and AS having different > protocols. > > But, since eclipse debugger is working over jdb, this means that jdb can talk > with the AS. Right??? Sounds like. But this is not the right forum for the question. We don't really (at least, officially) know anything about jdb. Only gdb. ;-) > I haven't still tried with jdb. Only with eclipse > debugger. > > Why gdb implements a protocol different from jdb? Where can i get more > information about gdb protocols? Because the gdb protocol predates java by at least 5 years.