From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24083 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2006 17:00:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 24074 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2006 17:00:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e4.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.144) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:00:42 +0000 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k59H0e78004117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:00:40 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.6/NCO/VER7.0) with ESMTP id k59H0efb251632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:00:40 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k59H0dTk014307 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:00:40 -0400 Received: from dufur.beaverton.ibm.com (dufur.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.22.20]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k59H0d2u014260; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:00:39 -0400 Subject: Re: Patch tracker now available From: PAUL GILLIAM Reply-To: pgilliam@us.ibm.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20060609142816.GA28863@nevyn.them.org> References: <20060330001459.GA13813@nevyn.them.org> <20060609142816.GA28863@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:56:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1149868537.3037.40.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 10:28 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: . . . > There is an associated rant, which is that I'd really appreciate more > help in reviewing submitted patches. I hope that adding tracking will > make it easier to see what needs review. Technically, this is a "cry for help", not a "rant". :-) If I had more general gdb expertise (and a little more slack in my schedule) I would feel honor-bound to help. -=# Paul #=-