Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: PAUL GILLIAM <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Strange stepping behaviour with PPC  64 and secure PLTs
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1143758781.21920.464.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)

On a system with secure PLTs for 32-bit apps, when 'next'ing through a
simple 32-bit hello world program, GDB does not execute 'printf' and
then stop.  Instead, it seems to get lost in the 'lazy' invocation of
the dynamic loader.  Here is a transcript:

        pgilliam:~/gdb/tree-head> build/gdb/gdb hello32
        GNU gdb 6.4.50.20060330-cvs
        ...
        This GDB was configured as "powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu"...Using
        host libthread_db library "/lib64/power4/libthread_db.so.1".
        
        (gdb) start
        Breakpoint 1 at 0x100004a4: file hello-simp.c, line 6.
        Starting program: /home/pgilliam/gdb/tree-head/hello32
        main () at hello-simp.c:6
        6           printf("Hello, world\n");
        (gdb) bt
        #0  main () at hello-simp.c:6
        (gdb) n
        0x10000810 in call___do_global_ctors_aux ()
        (gdb) bt
        #0  0x10000810 in call___do_global_ctors_aux ()
        #1  0x0fea97f0 in generic_start_main ()
        from /lib/power4/libc.so.6
        #2  0x0fea9a4c in __libc_start_main ()
        from /lib/power4/libc.so.6
        #3  0x00000000 in ?? ()
        (gdb) n
        Single stepping until exit from function
        call___do_global_ctors_aux,
        which has no line number information.
        0xf7ff5110 in _dl_runtime_resolve () from /lib/ld.so.1
        (gdb) bt
        #0  0xf7ff5110 in _dl_runtime_resolve () from /lib/ld.so.1
        #1  0x100004b0 in main () at hello-simp.c:6
        (gdb) n
        Single stepping until exit from function _dl_runtime_resolve,
        which has no line number information.
        0x0fef4f70 in puts () from /lib/power4/libc.so.6
        (gdb) bt
        #0  0x0fef4f70 in puts () from /lib/power4/libc.so.6
        #1  0x100004b0 in main () at hello-simp.c:6
        (gdb) n
        Single stepping until exit from function puts,
        which has no line number information.
        
        ---- apparent hang here (really single stepping through 'puts')
        ---

If I "finish" out of 'call___do_global_ctors_aux', things don't get back
on track.  Instead, GDB "finish"s out of 'main':

        pgilliam:~/gdb/tree-head> build/gdb/gdb hello32
        GNU gdb 6.4.50.20060330-cvs
        ...
        This GDB was configured as "powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu"...Using
        host libthread_db library "/lib64/power4/libthread_db.so.1".
        
        (gdb) start
        Breakpoint 1 at 0x100004a4: file hello-simp.c, line 6.
        Starting program: /home/pgilliam/gdb/tree-head/hello32
        main () at hello-simp.c:6
        6           printf("Hello, world\n");
        (gdb) bt
        #0  main () at hello-simp.c:6
        (gdb) n
        0x10000810 in call___do_global_ctors_aux ()
        (gdb) bt
        #0  0x10000810 in call___do_global_ctors_aux ()
        #1  0x0fea97f0 in generic_start_main ()
        from /lib/power4/libc.so.6
        #2  0x0fea9a4c in __libc_start_main ()
        from /lib/power4/libc.so.6
        #3  0x00000000 in ?? ()
        (gdb) finish
        Run till exit from #0  0x10000810 in call___do_global_ctors_aux
        ()
        Hello, world
        0x0fea97f0 in generic_start_main () from /lib/power4/libc.so.6
        (gdb) q
        
If I do a "next" instead of a finish when stopped at
call___do_global_ctors_aux, then the stack looks right again and a
"finish" will get things back on track.
        
        pgilliam@elm3b18:~/gdb/tree-head> build/gdb/gdb hello32
        GNU gdb 6.4.50.20060330-cvs
        ...
        This GDB was configured as "powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu"...Using
        host libthread_db library "/lib64/power4/libthread_db.so.1".
        
        (gdb) start
        Breakpoint 1 at 0x100004a4: file hello-simp.c, line 6.
        Starting program: /home/pgilliam/gdb/tree-head/hello32
        main () at hello-simp.c:6
        6           printf("Hello, world\n");
        (gdb) bt
        #0  main () at hello-simp.c:6
        (gdb) n
        0x10000810 in call___do_global_ctors_aux ()
        (gdb) bt
        #0  0x10000810 in call___do_global_ctors_aux ()
        #1  0x0fea97f0 in generic_start_main ()
        from /lib/power4/libc.so.6
        #2  0x0fea9a4c in __libc_start_main ()
        from /lib/power4/libc.so.6
        #3  0x00000000 in ?? ()
        (gdb) n
        Single stepping until exit from function
        call___do_global_ctors_aux,
        which has no line number information.
        0xf7ff5110 in _dl_runtime_resolve () from /lib/ld.so.1
        (gdb) bt
        #0  0xf7ff5110 in _dl_runtime_resolve () from /lib/ld.so.1
        #1  0x100004b0 in main () at hello-simp.c:6
        (gdb) finish
        Run till exit from #0  0xf7ff5110 in _dl_runtime_resolve ()
        from /lib/ld.so.1
        Hello, world
        main () at hello-simp.c:7
        7       }
        (gdb) bt
        #0  main () at hello-simp.c:7
        (gdb) c
        Continuing.
        
        Program exited with code 015.
        (gdb) q
        

Note: in the old 32-bit PowerPC ABI the value of a PLT entry was an
executable instruction.  This was deemed security risk so in the new
ABI, PLT entries are pointer to routines, much like they are for 64-bit
apps.  In GDB for PowerPC, finding the real address of the function is
done by 'bfd_get_synthetic_symtab' when the elf file is loaded.  If this
routine was not working correctly due to a change in the ABI, would that
explain what I am seeing?

-=# Paul #=-



             reply	other threads:[~2006-03-30 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-31  6:55 PAUL GILLIAM [this message]
2006-05-12  5:49 ` Strange stepping behaviour with PPC 32 " PAUL GILLIAM
2006-05-12  8:37   ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1143758781.21920.464.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com \
    --to=pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox