Re: single-stepping remote target fails

Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-23T20:43:47Z

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 04:37:32PM -0400, Chad Phillips wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:06:42PM -0400, Chad Phillips wrote:
> >>Sending packet: $s#73...Ack
> >>Packet received: S00
> >>Sending packet: $p40#d4...Ack
> >>Packet received: 0000438E
> >>
> >>Program received signal 0, Signal 0.
> >
> >You should be returning S05, SIGTRAP.
> >
>
> Fantastic! That solved my problem. Now, gdb continues to step to the
> next source instruction. Thanks!
>
> BTW, the documentation for the remote protocol simply says that the
> signal number is 'poorly defined', and in general to use UNIX
> conventions. I made the incorrect assumption that the signal number is
> irrelevant. Are there other signal numbers that have significance to GDB?

I think, only cosmetically.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC