From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1372 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2005 15:04:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 714 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jun 2005 15:03:46 -0000 Received: from 61.92.96-84.rev.gaoland.net (HELO sMtp.neuf.fr) (84.96.92.61) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:03:46 +0000 Received: from haypopc ([80.119.112.224]) by sp604002mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0II600CM5N19CPT0@sp604002mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:00:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:04:00 -0000 From: Victor STINNER Subject: Re: Display libc function names instead of address ? In-reply-to: <20050616044313.GA5950@nevyn.them.org> To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Reply-to: victor.stinner@haypocalc.com Message-id: <1118934045.2827.4.camel@haypopc> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: <1118892960.12713.5.camel@haypopc> <20050616044313.GA5950@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 Le jeudi 16 juin 2005 à 00:43 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit : > GDB can't do this - but, I think, that the very latest BFD/opcodes > library supports this for some targets. Someone needs to hook those > bits up to GDB. Yep you're right. Google said me that BFD and opcodes are part of binutils. So I took last CVS version. It gives me better result : 804839b: e8 10 ff ff ff call 80482b0 instead of 804839b: e8 10 ff ff ff call 80482b0 <_init+0x38> So I think that I have to wait until next GDB release. Bye, Haypo