From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20518-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 5760 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2005 10:05:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 5718 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2005 10:05:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.58)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2005 10:05:41 -0000
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0JA4V4m015316;
	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:04:31 GMT
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j0JA5drg007961;
	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:05:39 GMT
Received: (from rearnsha@localhost)
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id j0JA5dJV007959;
	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:05:39 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha set sender to rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org using -f
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] sim autoconf conversion fallout
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <41ED7982.3030106@gnu.org>
References: <200501161926.j0GJQGX7005764@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
	 <41ED6BFD.6060602@gnu.org>
	 <200501182035.j0IKZcrn004218@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
	 <41ED7982.3030106@gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: GNU
Message-Id: <1106129138.27061.21.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:05:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2

On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 21:02, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >It seems though that d10v is also broken.
> 
> Hardly suprising, the d10v is obsolete.
> 
> > Thanks for fixing it.  However, what's against configuring the common
> > directory unconditionally?  Makes things even simpler ;-).
> 
> Nothing.  Once the d10v is gone, that would make sense.
> 
> Andrew

May or may not be relevant, but the ARM simulator doesn't build anything
in the common directory.

R.