From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 300 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2004 22:48:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32727 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2004 22:48:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO universe.preston.net) (202.14.89.130) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 Sep 2004 22:48:15 -0000 Received: from cosmo.preston.net (cosmo.preston.net [202.14.10.54]) by universe.preston.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i82Mlu202396; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:47:58 +1000 Subject: RE: gdb 6.1.1 (PPC) crash (long) AND gdb crash in cp_print_class_method From: Craig Jeffree To: Dave Korn Cc: "'Fabian Cenedese'" , gdb@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Preston Aviation Solutions Message-Id: <1094165275.32298.130.camel@cosmo.preston.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 22:48:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 00:05, Dave Korn wrote: > Or perhaps as a consequence of the C++ ABI changes between gcc 2.9x and > gcc 3.x, or recent improvements and upgrading of dwarf handling. > > Craig, is your code also compiled using an old gcc 2.95 as well, by any > chance? > Yes. 2.95.3 infact. Cheers, Craig.