From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30602 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2003 10:59:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30593 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2003 10:59:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO calvin.codito.com) (203.199.140.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Oct 2003 10:59:05 -0000 Received: from numenor.codito.co.in (numenor.codito.co.in [192.168.100.52]) by calvin.codito.com (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h91AsN4O011459; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:24:26 +0530 Subject: Tracepoints with shared lib. support. From: Ramana Radhakrishnan Reply-To: ramana@codito.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com, ac131313@redhat.com, saurabh.verma@codito.com, ankit.thukral@codito.com, mark.newman@lmco.com In-Reply-To: <20030930125017.GA23342@nevyn.them.org> References: <1064924214.3808.157.camel@numenor.codito.co.in> <20030930125017.GA23342@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Codito Technologies Message-Id: <1065006023.3808.300.camel@numenor.codito.co.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 10:59:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 hi all, Another query i had was regarding tracepoints on shared library symbols. That would also have to be handled in a manner similar to the way in which the breakpoints for shared libraries have been implemented. I wonder if we need internal breakpoints on the shared library event handling which would then take care of mapping the addresses to the actual addresses because with the current status of tracepoints the addresses do not get mapped to the actual addresses. So if we had a tracepoint on a function in a shared library would we then not be increasing the number of halts in the actual execution of the program. regards Ramana