From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-12935-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 23171 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2003 15:14:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 23144 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2003 15:14:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 5 Mar 2003 15:14:05 -0000
Received: from shadowfax (tornado.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.228])
	by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E8EF080001E; Wed,  5 Mar 2003 10:14:03 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [maint] Guidelines for experimental branches
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
Reply-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
To: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <3E65D253.8050508@suse.cz>
References: <3E63E3D3.6070401@redhat.com> <3E648828.3080502@suse.cz>
	<slrnb6ahkh.e93.dnovillo@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> 
	<3E65D253.8050508@suse.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 15:14:00 -0000
Message-Id: <1046877245.1027.4.camel@shadowfax>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2

On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 05:32, Michal Ludvig wrote:

> So, could we say, that the date in there it optional?
> 
Yes, of course.  I was only rationalizing why would you want to have it
in the branch name.


Diego.