From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17137 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2003 19:47:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17130 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2003 19:47:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2003 19:47:50 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBJJloA28106 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:47:50 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBJJlnE19676; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:47:49 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-15.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.15]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBJJlmUx021301; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:47:48 -0500 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id hBJJlgY13836; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:47:42 -0700 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:47:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1031219194742.ZM13835@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Ray Bryant "Re: Remote debug support in gdb for ia64 ?" (Dec 17, 12:47pm) References: <20031217053840.13173.qmail@web20024.mail.yahoo.com> <1031217152952.ZM10905@localhost.localdomain> <3FE0A4C8.8090708@sgi.com> To: Ray Bryant , Kevin Buettner Subject: Re: Remote debug support in gdb for ia64 ? Cc: Deepak Gupta , gdb@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00251.txt.bz2 [message trimmed and rearranged] On Dec 17, 12:47pm, Ray Bryant wrote: > Kevin Buettner wrote: > > > Remote debugging of user space code (via gdbserver) used to work. > > I haven't tried it in a very long time, so I don't know if it still > > works or not. > > Hmmm... Does it work to run gdb on a i386 to debug ia64 code? At one time, yes. It may still, but I haven't tried it recently. Kevin