From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32568 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2003 21:43:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32560 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2003 21:43:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Oct 2003 21:43:40 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9KLhdM07949 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:43:39 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9KLhdr25778 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:43:39 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-50.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.50]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9KLhcwC010941; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:43:39 -0400 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h9KLhX621605; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:43:33 -0700 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:43:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1031020214332.ZM21604@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney ""No registers" or "No inferior to debug"?" (Oct 20, 5:28pm) References: <3F945382.8030203@redhat.com> To: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: "No registers" or "No inferior to debug"? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 On Oct 20, 5:28pm, Andrew Cagney wrote: > I'm wondering if the error message should be standardized vis: > > (gdb) info registers > No inferior to debug > (gdb) return > No inferior to debug This sounds reasonable to me. It is certainly better than seeing the "No registers" message. Kevin