From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-12516-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16303 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2003 23:21:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16296 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2003 23:21:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 17 Feb 2003 23:21:21 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1HNLLK13383
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:21:21 -0500
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1HNLKa26196;
	Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:21:20 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-1.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.1])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1HNLJs05585;
	Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:21:19 -0500
Received: (from kev@localhost)
	by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1HNLEw00571;
	Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:21:14 -0700
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 23:21:00 -0000
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1030217232113.ZM570@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
        "Re: frame_register_unwind(): "frame != NULL" assertion failure" (Feb 17,  4:37pm)
References: <1030213212349.ZM2427@localhost.localdomain> 
	<20030213212904.GA14115@nevyn.them.org> 
	<1030213213526.ZM2489@localhost.localdomain> 
	<1030213214819.ZM2541@localhost.localdomain> 
	<1030213232706.ZM8198@localhost.localdomain> 
	<3E4D042F.3060102@redhat.com> 
	<20030214151451.GC30416@nevyn.them.org> 
	<3E5101BA.5000504@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
   Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: frame_register_unwind(): "frame != NULL" assertion failure
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00289.txt.bz2

On Feb 17,  4:37pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:

>    /* Use proc_desc calculated in frame_chain */
>    proc_desc =
>      get_next_frame (fci)
>      ? cached_proc_desc
>      : find_proc_desc (get_frame_pc (fci), get_next_frame (fci), 1);
> 
> can you please change the above to be:
> 
>      : find_proc_desc (get_frame_pc (fci), NULL, 1);
> 
> (with a comment) and modify read_next_frame_reg() to, when NULL, pull a 
> value from the register cache.

I will do this, but I really do not think it's the best solution.  (If
we're going to be checking for frame == NULL, then why did you introduce
sentinel frames in the first place?)

Kevin